Low and middle-income Americans struggling to save for retirement are counting on the U.S. Senate to pass the SECURE Act. There’s no time to wait.
Millions of Americans would benefit. One provision alone will get 700,000 Americans who work for small businesses to begin saving for retirement.
SECURE is essential to help address America’s retirement savings gaps.
There is overwhelming, bipartisan support for SECURE. In fact, 417 members of the U.S. House voted for the bill. Only three members voted against SECURE. That’s less than 1 percent of the legislative body.
The detractors’ main beef is that it eliminates what’s emerged as a narrow tax planning loophole. Critics contend it is unfair to remove this “stretch IRA” provision, which allows adults who inherit large IRA balances to leave much of the money in the account to grow tax-deferred for decades.
The thing is, this sort of tax planning wasn’t ever intended by Congress when the IRA provision was passed. And what reform critics leave out is that for someone who uses their own IRA in retirement and spends it in retirement, or for someone who leaves the IRA to a spouse who uses it for retirement, the stretch IRA provision in the SECURE Act changes absolutely nothing.
In fact, less than 1 percent of American households would be impacted by the elimination of the stretch IRA. Just like less than 1 percent of the U.S. House voted against SECURE.
The SECURE Act isn’t for a select few. It’s for middle-income America. The bill’s stretch IRA provision and a small band of detractors shouldn’t wreck a retirement savings package that could help millions of working Americans.
It’s been 13 years since Congress sent retirement savings legislation to the President’s desk, despite the well documented need to get more Americans saving. Let’s hope the Senate finds a way to pass the SECURE Act without delay.
Latest posts by Susan Neely (see all)
- Consumers’ Own Interest at Stake with Genetic Privacy Bill - January 23, 2020
- ACLI Supports Junior Achievement, Financial Literacy - January 10, 2020
- Elitist Proposal Denies Choices to Bay State Retirement Savers - January 7, 2020